In Goa fire case Thailand Saurabh and Pride Luthra To Wednesday (17 December 2025) To court In present Did Went, court by Both the accused To apart Five days (22 December, till Sent into police custody. Police told the court that 25 people died in this horrific fire, while many others were seriously injured. both under investigation the accused Cognizable and non-surety first in crime vision Involvement Has come forward.
The police did their remand What did the report say?
1. Cognizable and non-surety first in crime vision Involvement:In investigation this Front Came Is That the accused of This Crime In direct Role Is, whose as a result 25 persons of death Hui And Many Other People Injured happened,
2. Direct Responsibility as Owner and Decision Maker: The accused are the owners/partners of the said establishment. They, along with their partners, coordinate operations, security arrangements, and necessary permissions and had complete control over the programs organized on the premises and illegal acts committed by them and omissions Are directly responsible for.
3. Organized dangerous activity despite full knowledge of the risk: Accused accused others the accused with the knowledge that it would cause a serious fire Accident Of hazard Is And casualties of Predominant Possibility Is, restaurant,club Fireworks were allowed and organized inside without any safety measures.
4. gross Negligence And rash conduct thereby endangering human life: Mandatory fire safety equipment required by the accused, emergency Evacuation arrangements and safe infrastructure were not provided, which gross Negligence And rash conduct is a clear example of and which human Life Serious danger In lay down,
5. statutory Permission And license Of Without Operation, Test In it Too Front Came Is That the accused by Able Authorities The establishment operated without obtaining the required statutory permission and license from the IPC, which in itself is a serious violation and a contributing factor to this incident.
6. emergency Lack of evacuation and safety structures: The premises where the business was being conducted by the accused and their associates ground Floor And deck Floor But emergency Exit doors were not available, which shows deliberate disregard for public safety and violation of safety standards.
7. Arrest necessary in the interest of justice and effective investigation: In view of the above circumstances, arrest of the accused is necessary in the interest of fair and effective investigation and justice.
8. To prevent recurrence of crime: Accused Hotel/restaurant Are owners/partners of the series. Police custody is necessary to prevent him and his associates from carrying out similar illegal and dangerous activities in future.
9. Objective (motive) To investigate: A thorough interrogation of the accused is necessary to find out the real motive behind the crime.
10. Likely to abscond: Likely to abscond the accused and their associates from the country. refusal Cannot be done. Therefore, police custody is necessary to stop this.
