The Madhya Pradesh High Court had made strict comments on the controversial statement of Minister Vijay Shah on women military officer Colonel Sophia Qureshi. Also ordered to register an FIR. In the case of Minister Vijay Shah, Justice Atul Sreedharan and Justice Anuradha Shukla were heard again on Thursday in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. According to the High Court order, the couple expressed displeasure over not being registered against Minister Vijay Shah against Minister Vijay Shah. The couple have said in their order during the hearing that the FIR has been written with such content, which can be canceled on challenging. The couple have asked to register an FIR, stating about the content mentioned in the order. Apart from this, the police investigation in the FIR will be monitored by the High Court.
Trending videos
The couple have said in their order that it is necessary to mention that Colonel Sophia Qureshi, along with Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, was the face of the armed forces that informed the media and the nation by our armed forces against Pakistan. The minister made a sarcastic remark against Colonel Sophia Qureshi, which could not be for anyone else but for him only. In a public ceremony, he has described Colonel Sophia Qureshi as the sister of terrorists who killed 26 untreated Indians in Pahalgam. The newspaper reports and the ministers available in digital content available on the Internet are available. In which he has said that India’s Prime Minister Narendra Modi has been sent to send the sister of terrorists to resolve them. His remarks are derogatory and dangerous for the concerned officer, but also for the armed forces. Prima facie there is a tendency to create disharmony and enmity or hatred or maliciousness between members of Muslim religion and other persons.
Also read-SC: ‘What kind of statements are you making, you are a responsible minister of the government’, Vijay Shah’s ‘Supreme’ rebuked
The couple have said in the order that BNS Based on the observation of various provisions of the state, the Director General of Police of the State is directed to register an FIR against the Minister Vijay Shah as per the order by Thursday evening. If the order is not followed, action can be taken against them for contempt. Earlier, the High Court took cognizance and issued orders against the minister to register immediate FIRs under sections 152, 196 (1) (B) and 197 (1) (C) of BNS. The order was also said that the state government minister Vijay Shah has used abusive language against a senior Indian Army officer in a public function in Raikunda village of Ambedkar Nagar on Monday. The armed forces are the last institution present in the country, which shows honesty, industry, discipline, sacrifice, selflessness, character, respect and indomitable courage. Any citizen of the country can recognize him himself. Minister Vijay Shah has used the Gutter language against Colonel Sophia Qureshi at the General Assembly.
During the hearing before the couple’s order on Thursday, the Advocate General told the bench that an FIR has been lodged against Minister Vijay Shah at Manpur police station. On observing the FIR, the couple found that on what basis the case has been registered against the accused, it was not mentioned. The order of the High Court will be followed literally. An FIR has been registered on the court’s order. During the hearing, the court has questioned the language, sections and methods of the FIR. The High Court has said that an FIR has been written with such a language that it is canceled. It does not mention the crime of the accused. It has been registered in view of the interest of the accused. On this, the Advocate General in the court said that the intention of the state should not be doubted. Court orders are being followed.
Also read- Vijay Shah: MP minister, High Court said- statement like cancer; What happened so far?
During the hearing, the court asked who draft the FIR? The Advocate General told the court that the FIR has been lodged in four hours as per the court order. The FIR has not been written in view of the interest of the accused. On this, the court questioned that the crime has taken place, there is no information about it.
The Advocate General also recited the FIR in the court during the hearing. The court said that this is not a case of murder. What has a person said here? There is no information about it. No information has been given in the FIR about the cognizance taken by the court. There is no information about crime.
Let me tell you that in the case of Minister Vijay Shah, on Wednesday, the High Court made a strong comment and described it as fatal like cancer. The High Court said that Minister Shah has used the gutter imprint language, which is unacceptable. After this, Mhow police registered an FIR against Vijay Shah late on Wednesday night. On Thursday, Vijay Shah also reached the shelter of the Supreme Court and demanded a ban on the FIR, but Shah did not get relief here. The Supreme Court reprimanded that you are a constitutional post and you should realize your responsibility. What kind of language are you using as a minister.
