MPPSC SSE EXAM – MPPSC SSE Exam: The main examination of MPPSC SSE will not be done now, the High Court gave the next date for hearing – MPPSC SSE Exam 2025 High Court Decision Stopped Mains EXAMONS SUMMONED RESPOSIS

MPPSC SSE EXAM – MPPSC SSE Exam: The main examination of MPPSC SSE will not be done now, the High Court gave the next date for hearing – MPPSC SSE Exam 2025 High Court Decision Stopped Mains EXAMONS SUMMONED RESPOSIS

The hearing has been held again in the Jabalpur bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court regarding MPPSC Main Exam 2025. The court has ordered that in the next hearing, the officers will be presented in the court who are responsible for not choosing the meritorious students of the reserved category in the unreserved category. Along with this, the High Court has also asked the state government to present its case on this matter. The court order is that if the information is not revealed in the next 2 weeks, then the government will be fined 15 thousand.

Next hearing will be held on 6 May

The court also said that all the documents related to the examination should be public because there is nothing confidential in the envelope after that seal. Now the next hearing about this case is to be held on 6 May. While hearing, the court has upheld the ban on MPPSC 2025 examination.

Accused of not releasing category wise marks

Senior advocates Rameshwar Singh Thakur and Vinayak Prasad Shah, on behalf of the capital Bhopal resident Sunit Yadav and other petitioners, presented the side in the Madhya Pradesh High Court. Advocates argued in the court that Madhya Pradesh Public Service Commission had declared the result of preliminary examination for the State Service Examination on 5 March 2025, which was conducted for the recruitment of 158 posts. However, this time the Commission did not release the cut-off marks by removing the pre-tradition, while this information has been released publicly in all the earlier examinations.

It was also said in the petition that the Commission has deliberately issued questions on transparency by not releasing cut-off marks. It is alleged that the Commission, bypassing the clear decisions given in the East of the Supreme Court and the High Court, did not include the candidates coming to the reserved category and the candidates coming in the merit for unreserved posts. The petitioners also alleged that the Commission declared the results by considering all the unreserved posts reserved only for the general category (General category), which is not only unconstitutional but also injustice to talented candidates.

Source link